Join the Conversation

Join the Conversation

We want to know what you think about our research on democracy!  Continue the conversation by posting a comment on our feedback blog, tweet us at @SamaraCda, or fill out a short questionnaire.

All Feedback | Back to Democracy Research

December 05, 2011

Tell us what you think!

by Wayne Chu

We want to make sure that our research is relevant to a broad spectrum of the Canadian public.  So we want to hear from you about what you think of our reports, and ways in which we can extend the conversation to more Canadians.  Let us know by posting a comment here, or by following the links to our Twitter and Facebook pages at the top of the page.

LABELS:
  • democracy talks

1 Comment Permanent link to this post

Comments

1 Comment

  1. Michael Polubinski

    13 Dec

    The hunger for inclusion motivates the many movements across the globe. This hunger is in response to the distorted distribution of resources and to the failures and injustices of representative democracies. To cure the apparent symptoms we have to remove the underlying causes. Each election of representatives changes (or does not) teams of power-addicted people surrounded by invariable environment, implicated in the same set of dependencies on support, money, relationships. The representative democracy had been developed in specific socio-political environment of the past; it has outlived its usefulness. Today the education, the distribution of information, the means to communicate are different from what was prevalent in challengers of past autocratic societies of United States   and France,. Democracy does not exist without civilian oversight of public governance sectors such as military, justice, health, education, communications, etc. It is time to review where we are and propose the system which will embrace the present. The legislative, judicial and executive functions of governance should be rearranged to reflect the sustainability, prosperity and aspirations of societies. The vertical divisions of society into endlessly confrontational political parties should be replaced by open-access horizontal layers of people who want to cooperate in improving governance sectors. The collection and distribution of public resources would be subject to the open debate culminating in the periodic referendum on determination of  sources and the allocation of resources. The judiciary and executive functions would be supervised by civilian oversight groups with the powers to define the requirements, manage the resources and determine the metrics of performance. Read more and contribute at:  http://whyweneeddemocracy.blogspot.com/2011/11/occupy-wall-street.html

Add a comment

  1.